issue_comments

Table actions

2 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 109242847 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date)

These facets timed out: author_association, issue

user 1

  • shoyer · 2 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
144644842 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/599#issuecomment-144644842 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/599 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NDY0NDg0Mg== shoyer 1217238 2015-10-01T07:40:29Z 2015-10-01T07:40:29Z MEMBER

Too late for what? :)

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   scikit-xray vs xray 109242847
144642185 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/599#issuecomment-144642185 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/599 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NDY0MjE4NQ== shoyer 1217238 2015-10-01T07:23:31Z 2015-10-01T07:23:31Z MEMBER

Yep, we've been considering renaming this package, though nothing has been decided yet. It's possibly worth adding an entry to the FAQ in the meanwhile.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   scikit-xray vs xray 109242847

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);