issue_comments

Table actions

4 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 100055216 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 3

issue 1

  • Option for closing files with scipy backend · 4 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 4 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
228412831 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/524#issuecomment-228412831 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/524 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIyODQxMjgzMQ== shoyer 1217238 2016-06-24T17:45:07Z 2016-06-24T17:45:07Z MEMBER

Something like this is still worth exploring (the LRU cache), but this isn't quite the right solution. So I'm closing this PR, just to clean up the list of outstanding PRs :).

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Option for closing files with scipy backend 100055216
205354820 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/524#issuecomment-205354820 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/524 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIwNTM1NDgyMA== rabernat 1197350 2016-04-04T15:37:16Z 2016-04-04T15:37:16Z MEMBER

Really? I figured this was a doomed concept.

@pwolfram it looks like you are doing the hard work that I did not have the time or expertise for. This will pay off big time once the distributed backend is working.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Option for closing files with scipy backend 100055216
147857068 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/524#issuecomment-147857068 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/524 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0Nzg1NzA2OA== rabernat 1197350 2015-10-13T21:19:14Z 2015-10-13T21:19:14Z MEMBER

I considered this more of a proof of concept than a serious PR. It was incredibly slow, but it circumvented the ulimit restriction. Probably not the best solution.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Option for closing files with scipy backend 100055216
147810879 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/524#issuecomment-147810879 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/524 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NzgxMDg3OQ== jhamman 2443309 2015-10-13T18:49:25Z 2015-10-13T18:49:25Z MEMBER

@shoyer and @rabernat - what do we want to do with this?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Option for closing files with scipy backend 100055216

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);