issue_comments
3 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR", issue = 698577111 and user = 3958036 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Inconsistency in whether index is created with new dimension coordinate? · 3 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1245036513 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4417#issuecomment-1245036513 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4417 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85KNb_h | johnomotani 3958036 | 2022-09-13T07:54:32Z | 2022-09-13T07:54:32Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks @benbovy - with explicit methods now to produce the result with or without index, I think we can close this now :smiley: |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Inconsistency in whether index is created with new dimension coordinate? 698577111 | |
| 691109135 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4417#issuecomment-691109135 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4417 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5MTEwOTEzNQ== | johnomotani 3958036 | 2020-09-11T13:54:01Z | 2020-09-11T13:54:01Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
:+1: On a quick glance it looks to me like #4108 would fix my issue here. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Inconsistency in whether index is created with new dimension coordinate? 698577111 | |
| 691045790 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4417#issuecomment-691045790 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4417 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5MTA0NTc5MA== | johnomotani 3958036 | 2020-09-11T11:45:40Z | 2020-09-11T11:45:40Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I haven't managed to get ds = xr.Dataset() ds['a'] = ('x', np.linspace(0,1)) ds['b'] = ('x', np.linspace(3,4)) ds = ds.rename(b='x') ds = ds.set_coords('x') ds = ds.set_index(x='x') print(ds)
print('indexes', ds.indexes)
One suggested solution in #2461 was to use ds = xr.Dataset() ds['a'] = ('x', np.linspace(0,1)) ds['b'] = ('x', np.linspace(3,4)) ds = ds.swap_dims({'x': 'b'}) ds = ds.rename(b='x') print(ds)
print('indexes', ds.indexes)
I found the behaviour confusing because I wasn't aware of the index variables at all... I create a coordinate with I may well be missing other context that makes this an undesirable thing to do, but for my use-case at least, I think it would make more sense if |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Inconsistency in whether index is created with new dimension coordinate? 698577111 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1