issue_comments
2 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR", issue = 683142059 and user = 51911758 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- restructure the contributing guide · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1492349784 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4361#issuecomment-1492349784 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4361 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Y83NY | remigathoni 51911758 | 2023-03-31T17:39:00Z | 2023-03-31T17:39:00Z | CONTRIBUTOR | An overview would make it easier to find sections for sure. Including what you've mentioned, here's what I have for the overview: OverviewProject Structure Prerequisites * Set up your development environment * Linux * Windows * Git workflow (Will link to an external resource) Code * Suggest a feature * Report a bug * Find an issue to work on * Set up the environment * Making changes * Create branch * Edit files * Documenting your changes * Testing * Writing tests * Running tests (for both the code and the docstrings where necessary ) * Commit your changes Links to the section that mentions pre-commit (and the pre-commit-ci bot) and commit message tags for controlling CI * Push to fork * Create a pull request * Automated tests * Backward Compatibility * Code standards and conventions Documentation * Suggest doc improvements * Find something to work on * Making small changes (e.g typo fixes) * Check existing GitHub issues * Propose a change * Set up the documentation environment * Ways to contribute to the documentation * User guide * Make changes * Build docs * Docstrings * Make changes * Docstrings format * How to write numpy style docstrings * Examples * Run doctests
PR best practices (Will link to short section on what to put into the PR description / title) I have tried to make the contribution workflow for the docs and code as separate as possible which I think makes it easier to follow. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
restructure the contributing guide 683142059 | |
1477031884 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4361#issuecomment-1477031884 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4361 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85YCbfM | remigathoni 51911758 | 2023-03-20T22:33:27Z | 2023-03-20T22:33:27Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @keewis What do you think of this structure? Structure for the Contribution GuideOverview
Ways to Contribute
How to Report a BugHow to Request an EnhancementSetting Up the Development EnvironmentBefore contributing to either the docs or the codebase, set up the dev environment. * Install Anaconda or miniconda * Fork the repository * Clone the repository Contribute to the CodebaseCode standards
How to contribute to the codebase
Contribute to the documentationDocumentation comprises of: * Docstrings - Add a numpy docstring guide * Docs in the xarray/doc folder - Uses rst How to contribute to the documentation
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
restructure the contributing guide 683142059 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1