issue_comments

Table actions

4 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR", issue = 253476466 and user = 221526 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • dopplershift · 4 ✖

issue 1

  • Better compression algorithms for NetCDF · 4 ✖

author_association 1

  • CONTRIBUTOR · 4 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
325713273 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1536#issuecomment-325713273 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1536 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyNTcxMzI3Mw== dopplershift 221526 2017-08-29T16:07:37Z 2017-08-29T16:07:37Z CONTRIBUTOR

Cool. Thx @shoyer .

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Better compression algorithms for NetCDF 253476466
325535079 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1536#issuecomment-325535079 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1536 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyNTUzNTA3OQ== dopplershift 221526 2017-08-29T02:17:02Z 2017-08-29T02:17:02Z CONTRIBUTOR

(cc @WardF)

Please, please, please don't write out "netCDF" files that don't conform to the spec. Either work with us to try to add the needed features to the spec (and the C-library) or call them something else. The spec exists for a reason. When such non-conformant files are distributed (and they will be), this creates a needless support load for the netcdf-c and netcdf-java developers (not to mention netCDF4-python).

Yes, I suppose so (and this should be fixed). h5netcdf currently writes the _NCProperties attribute to all files, though it uses a custom format that could be detected.

You're not actually saying the netCDF-c library should check for this custom format, are you?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Better compression algorithms for NetCDF 253476466
325515228 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1536#issuecomment-325515228 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1536 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyNTUxNTIyOA== dopplershift 221526 2017-08-28T23:57:02Z 2017-08-28T23:57:21Z CONTRIBUTOR

But these are still considered netCDF files, not HDF5 files? As in, they declare attributes that say "this is a netCDF file"?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Better compression algorithms for NetCDF 253476466
325513941 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1536#issuecomment-325513941 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1536 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyNTUxMzk0MQ== dopplershift 221526 2017-08-28T23:48:10Z 2017-08-28T23:48:10Z CONTRIBUTOR

@shoyer I just want to clarify: is the netCDF C library able to read files using these features?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Better compression algorithms for NetCDF 253476466

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);