home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

3 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR", issue = 170779798 and user = 4295853 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • pwolfram · 3 ✖

issue 1

  • New function for applying vectorized functions for unlabeled arrays to xarray objects · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • CONTRIBUTOR · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
248403503 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/964#issuecomment-248403503 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/964 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI0ODQwMzUwMw== pwolfram 4295853 2016-09-20T19:16:57Z 2016-09-20T19:16:57Z CONTRIBUTOR

@shoyer, I decided to go with the more robust approach and do the PR properly: #791.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  New function for applying vectorized functions for unlabeled arrays to xarray objects 170779798
248322967 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/964#issuecomment-248322967 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/964 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI0ODMyMjk2Nw== pwolfram 4295853 2016-09-20T14:44:48Z 2016-09-20T14:44:48Z CONTRIBUTOR

Also, should py.test work for stable and master? I was getting various errors and this seems strange to me-- I suspect it is a configuration issue on my end.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  New function for applying vectorized functions for unlabeled arrays to xarray objects 170779798
248322071 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/964#issuecomment-248322071 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/964 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI0ODMyMjA3MQ== pwolfram 4295853 2016-09-20T14:41:52Z 2016-09-20T14:41:52Z CONTRIBUTOR

@shoyer and others, quick question-- as it turns out I need functionality from #812 for my work. Is it best to build off that issue (with a half-baked branch) or this one? I can form a hacky stop-gap solution in the meantime but it is clear I need to finish this off for the long term. Thanks in advance for the advice.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  New function for applying vectorized functions for unlabeled arrays to xarray objects 170779798

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 1444.803ms · About: xarray-datasette