issue_comments
1 row where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR", issue = 100295585 and user = 11289391 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- support for units · 1 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 733629234 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/525#issuecomment-733629234 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/525 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczMzYyOTIzNA== | StanczakDominik 11289391 | 2020-11-25T10:48:57Z | 2020-11-25T10:48:57Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hi! I'm just popping in as a very interested user of both xarray and unit packages to ask: since there's been some awesome progress made here and pint-xarray is now enough of A Thing to have documentation, though obviously experimental - how much work would you expect a corresponding package for astropy's Quantities to take, given the current state of things? Are there any limitations that would prevent that? I saw the discussion above about Quantities being more problematic due to taking the subclass-from-numpy-arrays route, but I'm not sure how much of a roadblock that still is. I would suspect the API could be shared with pint-xarray (which, obviously, is experimental for now). |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
support for units 100295585 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1