home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

8 rows where author_association = "COLLABORATOR" and issue = 1261153511 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • headtr1ck 8

issue 1

  • Update DataArray.rename + docu · 8 ✖

author_association 1

  • COLLABORATOR · 8 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
1159433750 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6665#issuecomment-1159433750 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6665 IC_kwDOAMm_X85FG44W headtr1ck 43316012 2022-06-18T10:16:46Z 2022-06-18T10:16:46Z COLLABORATOR

I have created https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6704 and tried to copy a summary of this discussion. Feel free to continue the discussion there :)

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Update DataArray.rename + docu 1261153511
1153552538 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6665#issuecomment-1153552538 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6665 IC_kwDOAMm_X85EwdCa headtr1ck 43316012 2022-06-13T07:07:10Z 2022-06-13T07:07:10Z COLLABORATOR

So, how about we leave the current implemention like it is (or merge this PR, it does not really change the core functionality).

And then open another issue on how to procede with rename in light of the index refactor?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Update DataArray.rename + docu 1261153511
1153122466 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6665#issuecomment-1153122466 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6665 IC_kwDOAMm_X85Eu0Ci headtr1ck 43316012 2022-06-12T10:21:09Z 2022-06-12T10:21:09Z COLLABORATOR

Ok I see. I hereby withdraw my comment that it will be trivial, haha.

{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 1,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Update DataArray.rename + docu 1261153511
1152891482 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6665#issuecomment-1152891482 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6665 IC_kwDOAMm_X85Et7pa headtr1ck 43316012 2022-06-11T09:53:06Z 2022-06-11T09:53:06Z COLLABORATOR

I will implement a rename_dims method, this should be trivial.

I am not sure about rename_vars: what should this method do with the name of the DataArray? Should it only rename coords or also the name?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Update DataArray.rename + docu 1261153511
1150704268 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6665#issuecomment-1150704268 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6665 IC_kwDOAMm_X85EllqM headtr1ck 43316012 2022-06-09T05:59:36Z 2022-06-09T05:59:36Z COLLABORATOR

Honestly I am a big fan of functions that are called the same for DataArray and Dataset since this enables workflows on objects that could be either.

A rename_dims method sounds easy to implement. The rename_vars does not sound extremely convincing for DataArray though. Should this rename the array and it's coords?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Update DataArray.rename + docu 1261153511
1150260783 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6665#issuecomment-1150260783 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6665 IC_kwDOAMm_X85Ej5Yv headtr1ck 43316012 2022-06-08T18:37:43Z 2022-06-08T18:37:43Z COLLABORATOR

Now the behavior is the same as before with the only addition that one can rename the DataArray with a positional argument and its cords/dims via kwargs at the same time.

I have added further tests that are a bit more expressive than before.

Should be ready to merge now.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Update DataArray.rename + docu 1261153511
1146881160 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6665#issuecomment-1146881160 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6665 IC_kwDOAMm_X85EXASI headtr1ck 43316012 2022-06-05T20:49:33Z 2022-06-05T20:49:33Z COLLABORATOR

Now that I think about it... Is it common to have the DataArray being called the same as one of its dimensions/coordinates? This might break some things. So maybe better to revert the last commit that introduced this change?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Update DataArray.rename + docu 1261153511
1146880695 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6665#issuecomment-1146880695 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6665 IC_kwDOAMm_X85EXAK3 headtr1ck 43316012 2022-06-05T20:46:08Z 2022-06-05T20:46:08Z COLLABORATOR

Mow you can also have the name of the DataArray in the rename dict. The code got a bit more complicated, lots of if-branches are slight modifications of each other, probably simplifyable.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Update DataArray.rename + docu 1261153511

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 16.059ms · About: xarray-datasette