issue_comments: 916974087
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4825#issuecomment-916974087 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4825 | 916974087 | IC_kwDOAMm_X842p-oH | 4160723 | 2021-09-10T15:04:14Z | 2021-09-10T15:04:14Z | MEMBER | I think that the explicit index refactoring would be an opportunity to clarify things a bit. With no concept of a dimension coordinate/ implicit index, ideally we could have the following behavior with a clear distinction between dimensions/coordinates and indexes, following more closely the "explicit is better than implicit" principle:
This would be in an ideal world, though. More practically, I don't know how we could make a smooth transition.
|
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
789106802 |