issue_comments: 897958480
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5694#issuecomment-897958480 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5694 | 897958480 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841hcJQ | 5635139 | 2021-08-12T20:50:24Z | 2021-08-12T20:50:24Z | MEMBER |
Ah nice! That would be better. I guess we want it for new code — it would be the herculean effort to fix the old code, most of which doesn't imply a true problem. FWIW I think most of the false positives are when reassinging variables to different types; e.g. Is there a way of explaining the TODO in a way that's easy for new contributors to understand? That's probably the closest solution here |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
967854972 |