home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 894378303

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5667#issuecomment-894378303 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5667 894378303 IC_kwDOAMm_X841TyE_ 5635139 2021-08-06T16:35:33Z 2021-08-06T16:35:33Z MEMBER

Using a.copy() seems to be the way to go if you want to do a shallow copy of a dict.

That is an interesting result (even aside from the main result here, I'm not sure what python is doing such that copy.copy(a) has different performance from copy(a)!)

But python is slow, and nanos are short — unless there's a noticeable impact on the overall performance, then prioritizing flexibility and compatibility are more consistent with the goals of the library. Does that make sense?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  958878760
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.756ms · About: xarray-datasette