home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 889952277

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5648#issuecomment-889952277 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5648 889952277 IC_kwDOAMm_X841C5gV 35968931 2021-07-30T15:01:58Z 2021-07-30T15:01:58Z MEMBER

Thanks to everyone ho has expressed interest already! I'll give some more time for responses before starting to think about potential meeting times.

There probably isn't much to say though - PyTorch is unlikely to adopt array_function at this point, just like JAX.

Interesting - could you say a bit more? Looking at these two issues, it seemed more like the question was simply on hold until someone who wanted it badly enough came along?

https://github.com/google/jax/issues/1565

https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/22402

(I'm interested because I'm in the set of people who have an ambition to use these libraries (wrapped in xarray) at some point further down the line, but that might remain just an ambition :sweat_smile:)

The key thing here seems to be Dask <-> Xarray <-> Pint, unless I'm missing something?

You're right, that was the primary motivation for this issue, but it also seemed like a good opportunity to get as many libraries talking (and their relationships codified) as possible, especially if one of the outcomes ends up being a type casting hierarchy resource/NEP.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  956103236
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.827ms · About: xarray-datasette