home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments: 889875756

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5648#issuecomment-889875756 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5648 889875756 IC_kwDOAMm_X841Cm0s 98330 2021-07-30T12:59:04Z 2021-07-30T12:59:04Z NONE

I'm happy to join, seems interesting. And yes, I can say something about PyTorch. There probably isn't much to say though - PyTorch is unlikely to adopt __array_function__ at this point, just like JAX. And it doesn't seem critical for this hierarchy anyway - the fundamental array objects (PyTorch/CuPy/NumPy/Sparse/JAX arrays or tensors) do not have or need a class hierarchy, they are all at the bottom and should not be mixed.

The key thing here seems to be Dask <-> Xarray <-> Pint, unless I'm missing something?

{
    "total_count": 2,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 1,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  956103236
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 77.819ms · About: xarray-datasette