issue_comments: 887324339

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5609#issuecomment-887324339 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5609 887324339 IC_kwDOAMm_X840436z 35919497 2021-07-27T08:37:35Z 2021-07-27T08:38:30Z COLLABORATOR

I would try to stay as close to open_dataset as possible, which would make migrating to rioxarray's engine easier once we deprecate open_rasterio. If I understand the signature of open_dataset correctly, this is called backend_kwargs?

The idea was to deprecate in the future open_dataset backend_kwargs. Currently, in open_dataset signature, you can use either backend_kwargs or kwargs to pass the backend additional parameters. I would avoid adding backend_kwargs in open_rasterio interface.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   945434599