issue_comments: 886261206
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5542#issuecomment-886261206 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5542 | 886261206 | IC_kwDOAMm_X84000XW | 14371165 | 2021-07-25T21:38:49Z | 2021-07-25T21:38:49Z | MEMBER |
Yes, that's the copy that's slow and there's no real need to create a new copy in the 1D case. My (bad) idea was to just return the original array there instead, but as you noted that might not be fully intuitive. A ASV for 1D- and ND-interpolation and having it running in the CI would be nice. Though I'm not really interested in implementing that, It would be just another thing to document for me because I use other profilers anyway and as you said getting it setup requires some work that I don't enjoy. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
931016490 |