issue_comments: 886253326
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5542#issuecomment-886253326 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5542 | 886253326 | IC_kwDOAMm_X8400ycO | 5635139 | 2021-07-25T20:25:15Z | 2021-07-25T21:19:01Z | MEMBER | ~Yeah, I guess if someone does ~So maybe this is the best we can hope for.~ Edit: actually is this already implemented? https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/main/xarray/core/variable.py#L1441-L1444. Does interpolate not hit this code path? Is it worth adding an ASV? I've found them fairly quick to set up a new one, though takes some lift to set up the environment etc. I think in general we should try and have them for performance work, so we can track if it regresses. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
931016490 |