issue_comments: 883226384
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5620#issuecomment-883226384 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5620 | 883226384 | IC_kwDOAMm_X840pPcQ | 14808389 | 2021-07-20T09:01:34Z | 2021-07-20T09:01:34Z | MEMBER | @meteoDaniel, it ultimately comes down to how much time a maintainer is willing to spend on a single issue, with self-contained, small examples being much easier to debug (and there are a few other reasons in the blog post linked to by @max-sixty). That said, I can reproduce your issue, which apparently is independent of the way the mask is constructed: ```python mask = ( (latitudes <= maxLat) & (latitudes > minLat) & (longitudes <= maxLon) & (longitudes > minLon) ) ds.where(xr.DataArray(mask, dims=("y", "x")), drop=True).latitude.max() # 49.30 latitudes[mask].max() # 48.92 ``` However, if I do
Interestingly, |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
947796627 |