issue_comments: 881106553
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5604#issuecomment-881106553 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5604 | 881106553 | IC_kwDOAMm_X840hJ55 | 49487505 | 2021-07-16T01:13:11Z | 2021-07-16T01:13:11Z | NONE | For Ubar it says dask.array<where, shape=(59, 1100, 1249), dtype=float64, chunksize=(59, 1100, 1249), chunktype=numpy.ndarray> But for U it says dask.array<concatenate, shape=(59, 35, 1100, 1249), dtype=float64, chunksize=(1, 1, 1100, 1249), chunktype=numpy.ndarray> Those are very different operations, is that the reason for the 1000Gb consumption? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
944996552 |