issue_comments: 876397215
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4118#issuecomment-876397215 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4118 | 876397215 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg3NjM5NzIxNQ== | 7611856 | 2021-07-08T12:27:58Z | 2021-07-08T12:27:58Z | NONE | As a user who (so far) does not use any netCDF or HDF5 features of xarray I obviously would not like to have a otherwise potentially useful feature blocked by restrictions imposed by netCDF or HDF5 ;-). That said - I think @tacaswell comment about round trips is very reasonable and such invariants should be maintained! It would be extremely confusing for users if netcdf -> xarray-> netcdf is not a "no-op". The same obviously holds true for any other storage format. As a user I would generally expect something like the following:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
628719058 |