issue_comments: 870109486
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5545#issuecomment-870109486 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5545 | 870109486 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg3MDEwOTQ4Ng== | 1217238 | 2021-06-28T23:18:08Z | 2021-06-28T23:18:08Z | MEMBER | I think a bigger number than 12 would be appropriate. Personally I would almost always prefer to see the full output, even (especially?) if it's big. The only exception would be cases where variables are (mis)used instead of a dimension, e.g., There are plenty of examples of datasets/netCDF files with tens of distinct variables, and I think we should reveal these variables by default. For example, consider this xgcm example of ocean model output with 35 data varaibles: https://xgcm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/xgcm-examples/01_eccov4.html I'm thinking that perhaps 50 or 100 would be a better default? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
931591247 |