issue_comments: 864594346
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4540#issuecomment-864594346 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4540 | 864594346 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg2NDU5NDM0Ng== | 5635139 | 2021-06-20T18:32:11Z | 2021-06-20T18:32:11Z | MEMBER | @dcherian I know we discussed this a couple of weeks ago, and I said I was hoping to take another pass at this using https://github.com/dcherian/dask_groupby For transparency, I haven't managed to spend any time on this yet. I certainly don't want to block you if you're interested in taking this forward. FWIW my selfish motivation is more around speeding up in-memory groupbys than dask groupbys — the elegance of numpy_groupies & dask_groupby is that they can potentially be unified. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
729208432 |