issue_comments: 830237579
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5089#issuecomment-830237579 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5089 | 830237579 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgzMDIzNzU3OQ== | 5635139 | 2021-04-30T17:12:02Z | 2021-04-30T17:12:02Z | MEMBER | This is great work and it would be good to get this in for the upcoming release https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5232. I think there are two paths: 1. Narrow: merge the functionality which works along 1D dimensioned coords 2. Full: Ensure we're at consensus on how we handle >1D coords I would mildly vote for narrow. While I would also vote to merge it as-is, I think it's not a huge task to move wide onto a new branch. @ahuang11 what are your thoughts? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
842940980 |