issue_comments: 830150205
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5102#issuecomment-830150205 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5102 | 830150205 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgzMDE1MDIwNQ== | 4160723 | 2021-04-30T14:53:12Z | 2021-04-30T14:53:12Z | MEMBER | This is ready for review! I implemented @shoyer's suggestions and finished updating the (many) places where Xarray directly uses pandas indexes. I also added a There might still be some quick fixes that we could clean up now, but I think that most things will have to be cleaned up later in the refactoring once additional features/classes/etc. are implemented. I haven't wrote tests for the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
849315490 |