issue_comments: 826374418

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5215#issuecomment-826374418 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5215 826374418 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyNjM3NDQxOA== 5635139 2021-04-25T19:10:36Z 2021-04-25T19:10:36Z MEMBER

.cumulative is great! Much better.

The benefit is that the API surface is reduced — e.g. we can have a .cumulative().integrate(), rather than a separate .cumulative_integrate (and so on, for each aggregation), from https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5153.

The implementation could be as simple as da.rolling(dim=da.sizes[dim]). How compatible would dask be with that? How does it compare to the numpy.ufunc.accumulate(...) suggestion?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   866826033