issue_comments: 822053610
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5031#issuecomment-822053610 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5031 | 822053610 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyMjA1MzYxMA== | 5635139 | 2021-04-18T20:13:09Z | 2021-04-18T20:13:09Z | MEMBER | Sorry for the recent slow-down in reviews @Illviljan , and thank you for your recent PRs. I'm going to suggest we find a more robust system for ensuring PRs get prompt reviews in our next dev meeting. Are people OK to merge this? While it brings up some broader issues, as long as this change doesn't cause those issues to be harder to resolve, this behavior seems good, as described by @dcherian :
(But I've been less involved in the details of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
830918156 |