issue_comments: 821881984
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5179#issuecomment-821881984 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5179 | 821881984 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyMTg4MTk4NA== | 1200058 | 2021-04-17T20:22:13Z | 2021-04-17T20:27:25Z | NONE | @max-sixty The reason is that my method is basically a special case of point-wise indexing: http://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/indexing.html#more-advanced-indexing You can get the same result by calling: ```python core_dim_locs = {key: value for key, value in core_dim_locs_from_cond(mask, new_dim_name="newdim")} pointwise selectiondata.sel( dim_0=outliers_subset["dim_0"], dim_1=outliers_subset["dim_1"], dim_2=outliers_subset["dim_2"] ) ``` (Note that you loose chunk information by this method, that's why it is less efficient) When you want to select random items from a N-dimensional array, you can either model the result as some sparse array or by stacking the dimensions. (OK, stacking the dimensions means also a sparse COO encoding...) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
860418546 |