issue_comments: 820832966
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5155#issuecomment-820832966 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5155 | 820832966 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyMDgzMjk2Ng== | 6628425 | 2021-04-16T00:54:09Z | 2021-04-16T00:54:28Z | MEMBER | Thanks for opening up this discussion @aulemahal! It's great to see the boundaries being pushed on what can be done with cftime dates in xarray.
I think something like this would be cool too (see the end of https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4092#discussion_r439101051). Attributes on the
Both
We actually considered something like this in the initial stages of writing Using the calendar argument, as opposed to the range of the dates, to decide what type to return is a slightly different twist than what was discussed previously. I don't know how I feel about that. On one hand I can see why it would be convenient, but on the other hand Would that work for your use-case? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
857947050 |