issue_comments: 782733509
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4927#issuecomment-782733509 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4927 | 782733509 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MjczMzUwOQ== | 6628425 | 2021-02-20T19:02:02Z | 2021-02-20T19:02:02Z | MEMBER | Sorry for chiming in a bit late -- I just want to make sure, is this truly valid under the CF Conventions? It seems to open the door for ambiguity; e.g. it's a pathological example, but one could imagine a "time_reference" variable named in the form of a date. In that case what takes precedence when decoding the times, the value of the date in the name, or the value the variable refers to? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
811933067 |