home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 782733509

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4927#issuecomment-782733509 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4927 782733509 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MjczMzUwOQ== 6628425 2021-02-20T19:02:02Z 2021-02-20T19:02:02Z MEMBER

Sorry for chiming in a bit late -- I just want to make sure, is this truly valid under the CF Conventions? It seems to open the door for ambiguity; e.g. it's a pathological example, but one could imagine a "time_reference" variable named in the form of a date. In that case what takes precedence when decoding the times, the value of the date in the name, or the value the variable refers to?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  811933067
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 1.235ms · About: xarray-datasette