issue_comments: 778706122
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4904#issuecomment-778706122 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4904 | 778706122 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3ODcwNjEyMg== | 5635139 | 2021-02-14T01:38:15Z | 2021-02-14T01:38:15Z | MEMBER | Thanks a lot @rhkleijn , this is very impressive! The results look great. The Did you ever consider replacing the injections with this macro-like approach to writing out the python methods, rather than using the macro to generate the stub files? (I don't bring this up with a view that it's better, but the injections have always seemed awkward) Is there anything we should be aware of around the interactions between stub files and inline definitions? Others will have useful thoughts too, so would be interested to hear from them too. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
807764700 |