issue_comments: 775749858

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4879#issuecomment-775749858 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4879 775749858 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3NTc0OTg1OA== 1217238 2021-02-09T08:05:40Z 2021-02-09T08:05:40Z MEMBER

Thanks for sharing the test case, which I'll add to this PR. I ran it locally and it seems to pass with this PR for the netCDF4 and SciPy netCDF backends (but not h5netcdf). So I'm not entirely sure what to make of that.

On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 1:56 PM Christian Jauvin notifications@github.com wrote:

As my colleague @huard https://github.com/huard suggested, I have written an additional test which demonstrates the problem (essentially the same idea I proposed in my initial issue https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4862):

master...cjauvin:add-netcdf-refresh-test https://github.com/pydata/xarray/compare/master...cjauvin:add-netcdf-refresh-test

As I explained in the issue I have a potential fix for the problem:

master...cjauvin:netcdf-caching-bug https://github.com/pydata/xarray/compare/master...cjauvin:netcdf-caching-bug

but the problem is that it feels a bit weird to have to that, so I suspect that there's a better way to solve it.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4879#issuecomment-775489828, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJJFVTISNAZV4YYOUMURLLS6BMZHANCNFSM4XH4MWIA . 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   803068773