issue_comments: 725795622
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4574#issuecomment-725795622 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4574 | 725795622 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyNTc5NTYyMg== | 5635139 | 2020-11-12T02:53:43Z | 2020-11-12T02:53:43Z | MEMBER |
That's a good point. A "allowed failure" would be even better. Though on balance, assuming we can't do "allowed failures", I would favor more accurate test results over the immediacy of broken tests on upstream deps + new code. I'm not sure there are that many failures in the intersection of upstream deps + new code. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
741115905 |