issue_comments: 685200043
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4183#issuecomment-685200043 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4183 | 685200043 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4NTIwMDA0Mw== | 90008 | 2020-09-02T00:13:30Z | 2020-09-02T00:13:30Z | CONTRIBUTOR | i ran into this problem trying to round trip time to the nanosecond (even though i don't need it, sub micro second would be nice) but unfrotunately, you run into the fact that cftime doesn't support nanoseconds https://github.com/Unidata/cftime/blob/master/cftime/_cftime.pyx Seems like they discussed a nanosecond issue a while back too https://github.com/Unidata/cftime/issues/77 Their ultimate point was that there was little point in having precision down to the nano second given that python datetime objects only have microseconds. I guess they are right. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
646038170 |