issue_comments: 676708744
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4355#issuecomment-676708744 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4355 | 676708744 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3NjcwODc0NA== | 5635139 | 2020-08-19T21:15:47Z | 2020-08-19T21:15:47Z | MEMBER | Agree with these changes, thanks @keewis Stepping back on the contributing doc — I admit I haven't look at it in a while — I wonder whether we can slim it down a bit, for example by linking to other docs for generic tooling — I imagine we're unlikely to have the best docs on working with GH, for example. Or referencing our PR template rather than the (now out-of-date) PR checklist. |
{
"total_count": 2,
"+1": 2,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
682040124 |