home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments: 670996109

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2844#issuecomment-670996109 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2844 670996109 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3MDk5NjEwOQ== 22566757 2020-08-09T02:17:07Z 2020-08-09T16:36:12Z CONTRIBUTOR

That's two people with that view so I made the change.

Again, I feel that the quality flags are essentially meaningless on their own, useful primarily in the context of their associated variables, like the items currently put in the XArray coords attribute, which, admittedly, is only those variables identified by CF as dimension or auxiliary coordinates at the moment, and should remain associated with the relevant variable even if it is extracted into a DataArray. Since all of the other people who have opinions on the matter seem to disagree with me, I changed the code to preserve the present behavior with regards to ancillary_variables. I can always monkey-patch it back in if it really bothers me, or add a Dataset.__getitem__ wrapper to xarray-contrib/cf-xarray so that the ancillary_variables stay associated when I pull variables out, or move back to SciTools/iris.

On a related note, I should probably check whether this breaks conversion to an iris.Cube.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  424265093
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.658ms · About: xarray-datasette