issue_comments: 670996109
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2844#issuecomment-670996109 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2844 | 670996109 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3MDk5NjEwOQ== | 22566757 | 2020-08-09T02:17:07Z | 2020-08-09T16:36:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | That's two people with that view so I made the change. Again, I feel that the quality flags are essentially meaningless on their own, useful primarily in the context of their associated variables, like the items currently put in the XArray On a related note, I should probably check whether this breaks conversion to an |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
424265093 |