issue_comments: 670978328
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1050#issuecomment-670978328 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1050 | 670978328 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3MDk3ODMyOA== | 5635139 | 2020-08-08T21:59:18Z | 2020-08-08T21:59:18Z | MEMBER | Thanks for finding that @sjvrijn I don't have a view on what we should use, so I would vote to defer to numpy (and pandas, which also seems to use 1), referencing that documentation to the extent xarray isn't changing anything. But others probably have a stronger view on which |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
183713222 |