issue_comments: 670816691
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2844#issuecomment-670816691 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2844 | 670816691 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3MDgxNjY5MQ== | 22566757 | 2020-08-08T03:25:17Z | 2020-08-08T03:53:39Z | CONTRIBUTOR | You are correct; My personal view is that the quality information should stay with the variable it describes unless explicitly dropped; I think your view is that quality information can always be extracted from the original dataset, and that no variable should carry quality information for a different variable. At this point it would be simple to remove I should point out that a similar situation arises for |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
424265093 |