issue_comments: 670248276
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4314#issuecomment-670248276 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4314 | 670248276 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3MDI0ODI3Ng== | 5635139 | 2020-08-06T23:59:16Z | 2020-08-06T23:59:16Z | MEMBER | I'm fine with reraising — though I think we should reraise, otherwise isn't it a confusing message? The try-expect is probably fine given the narrowness (very open to holding too low a standard tho); one step up would be checking it is a spare array. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
673757961 |