home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 663117842

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4208#issuecomment-663117842 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4208 663117842 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY2MzExNzg0Mg== 2448579 2020-07-23T16:55:11Z 2020-07-23T16:55:11Z MEMBER

A couple of things came up in #4221 1. how do we ask a duck dask array to rechunk itself? pint seems to forward the .rechunk call but that isn't formalized anywhere AFAICT. 2. less important: should duck dask arrays cache their token somewhere? dask.array uses .name to do this and xarray uses that to check equality cheaply. We can use tokenize of course. But I'm wondering if it's worth asking duck dask arrays to cache their token as an optimization.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  653430454
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.593ms · About: xarray-datasette