issue_comments: 662806773
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4236#issuecomment-662806773 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4236 | 662806773 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY2MjgwNjc3Mw== | 8098361 | 2020-07-23T03:56:09Z | 2020-07-23T03:56:09Z | NONE | Thanks for the suggestion of Otherwise, I do agree with you about when args would need to be passed, ie. individual file processing that can't be done outside. Obviously if you don't need args, don't pass any. While I see now my use case doesn't need that, there still might be others that do, though this might be rare (later I'll need to add a dimension for each file with a value that varies between files, but luckily I can extract that from the filename). I was imagining additional args working something like the way the Any additional arguments are passed on to job_func when the job runs. :param job_func: The function to be scheduled :return: The invoked job instance File: d:\anaconda3\lib\site-packages\schedule__init__.py Type: function ``` My original intent was cutting down the data I was loading from large files by managing that through the preprocess callback. But this is where I readily admit not knowing how xarray handles things under the covers which means I do things the wrong (sub-optimal?) way. I'm not the only one that is struggling with what is optimal though; Unexpected behaviour when chunking with multiple netcdf files in xarray/dask |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
659142789 |