issue_comments: 615500990

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3213#issuecomment-615500990 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3213 615500990 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxNTUwMDk5MA== 449558 2020-04-17T23:07:57Z 2020-04-17T23:07:57Z NONE

@shoyer thanks! Mostly spitballing here, but it's interesting to know that 2) would be the bigger problem in your opinion, I had assumed 1) would be the main issue. That raises the question whether it's easier to wrap scipy.sparse in a duck array, or to make pydata/sparse a viable solution for sklearn.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   479942077