issue_comments: 612486735
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3891#issuecomment-612486735 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3891 | 612486735 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxMjQ4NjczNQ== | 35968931 | 2020-04-11T18:39:58Z | 2020-04-11T18:39:58Z | MEMBER | I'm trying to imagine what the approach that delegated the largest fraction of the work to an attrs-handling plugin would be. Would it be to give the attrs plugin the input, and the name of the function/method that was being called, and let the plugin completely decide the output attrs? Or would that be under-specified? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
587895591 |