issue_comments: 610799451
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3955#issuecomment-610799451 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3955 | 610799451 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxMDc5OTQ1MQ== | 5821660 | 2020-04-08T07:31:26Z | 2020-04-08T07:42:03Z | MEMBER | There has been a lot of discussion about the int vs nan problem in the past, here one issue #1194. My question for xarray-devs would be too, if there is some idea on adapting to the pandas scheme? In the time being, you might just go the other way round ( ```python overwrite fill_values with 0sub = xr.where(z_indices == fill_value, 0, z_indices) isel with sub and mask with whereindexed_array = val_arr.isel(z=sub).where(z_indices != fill_value)
```python overwrite fill_values with 0sub = xr.where(z_indices == fill_value, 0, z_indices) isel with sub and mask with whereindexed_array = val_arr.isel(z=sub) indexed_array = xr.where(z_indices == fill_value, fill_value, indexed_array) ``` I can't immediately see, but there might be a cleaner way to achieve this. |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
596352097 |