issue_comments: 589985055
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3786#issuecomment-589985055 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3786 | 589985055 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU4OTk4NTA1NQ== | 5635139 | 2020-02-22T18:31:56Z | 2020-02-22T18:31:56Z | MEMBER | I think I see your point @takluyver — that by returning the new axes at the end it's both surprising and no longer a contiguous array. But then +1 re your final point about unstack being unable to return a view on missing data. I don't think it's impossible to carefully manage the dimensions order & contiguous-ness in this case. It may take someone who can champion it, though |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
568968607 |