issue_comments: 57926291
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/175#issuecomment-57926291 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/175 | 57926291 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3OTI2Mjkx | 1217238 | 2014-10-05T04:24:08Z | 2014-10-05T04:24:08Z | MEMBER | @akleeman I just read over my rebased versions of this patch again, and unfortunately, although there are some useful features here (missing value support and not writing trivial indexes), overall I don't think this is the right approach. The idea of decoding data stores into "CF decoded" data stores is clever, but (1) it adds a large amount of indirection/complexity and (2) it's not even flexible enough (e.g., it won't suffice to decode coordinates, since those only exist on datasets). Functions for CF decoding/encoding that transform a datastore to a dataset directly (and vice versa), more similar to the existing design, seem like a better option overall. As we discussed, adding an argument like an To make things more extensible, let's add a handful of utility functions/classes to the public API (e.g., |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
36467304 |