issue_comments: 577696741
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3545#issuecomment-577696741 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3545 | 577696741 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3NzY5Njc0MQ== | 5821660 | 2020-01-23T14:08:57Z | 2020-01-23T14:08:57Z | MEMBER | @scottcha @shoyer For one of my use cases (240 datasets, 1 with missing variables) I do not see any performance penalties using this implementation compared to the current. But this might be due to the fact, that the most time consuming part is the If I can be of any help to push this over the line, please ping me. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
524043729 |