issue_comments: 565625792
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3620#issuecomment-565625792 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3620 | 565625792 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2NTYyNTc5Mg== | 2448579 | 2019-12-13T22:05:07Z | 2019-12-13T22:05:07Z | MEMBER | It would also be good to hear about "sub-pixel metadata" → this seems to be the main reason why you want to carry around the analytic rather than the discrete evaluated form (which we basically support through dask). Is that right or am I missing something? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
537772490 |