issue_comments: 557111157
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3557#issuecomment-557111157 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3557 | 557111157 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1NzExMTE1Nw== | 14808389 | 2019-11-21T14:33:07Z | 2019-11-21T14:33:07Z | MEMBER | okay, now the cherry-picking is done and the number of touched files is down to a more reasonable 14, though I dropped the non-PR commits. I'm not sure which of these was really necessary, but I guess that's something that we will notice once we try to get CI and readthedocs to work? The original branch is still available for comparison on scipy19-docs @dcherian (or anyone else who knows a bit more about RTD than me), can you help me fix the readthedocs builds? I can't test anything as long as the environment creation fails. |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
526273373 |