issue_comments: 554113722
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3493#issuecomment-554113722 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3493 | 554113722 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1NDExMzcyMg== | 14808389 | 2019-11-14T22:36:51Z | 2019-11-14T22:36:51Z | MEMBER | hmm... well, I certainly agree the tests are often quite verbose (maybe too verbose) and sometimes also test functionality of pint (e.g. when incompatible, compatible and identical units are tried). I didn't check, but I don't remember any overlaps with tests from To reduce the code, it might be worth to only test compatible units. We could also try to use helper functions for data creation, but while that reduces the code it also makes understanding it a little bit harder. If Reusing tests from |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
519490511 |