home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments: 552594045

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3509#issuecomment-552594045 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3509 552594045 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1MjU5NDA0NQ== 3460034 2019-11-11T20:06:49Z 2019-11-11T20:06:49Z CONTRIBUTOR

With regards to physical units (and to a lesser extent propagation of uncertainties), this would have overlap with pint. Efforts have been ongoing towards integration with xarray through NEP-18 (xref https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/525, https://github.com/hgrecco/pint/pull/764, https://github.com/hgrecco/pint/issues/845, https://github.com/hgrecco/pint/issues/849, as well as https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3238 and following test implementation PRs), but are still not quite there yet...hopefully very soon though!

Would you be able to describe any advantages/disadvantages you would see with xarray wrapping scipp, versus something like xarray > pint > uncertainties > numpy?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  520815068
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 74.59ms · About: xarray-datasette