issue_comments: 54416883
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/25#issuecomment-54416883 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/25 | 54416883 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NDE2ODgz | 1217238 | 2014-09-04T06:50:49Z | 2014-09-04T06:50:49Z | MEMBER | I'm going to close this issue as fixed, but feel free to complain if you feel otherwise (particularly if you have ideas for how we should improve this). The rule that we seem to have settled on is that xray will either drop all attributes if the result could be ambiguous, or, if there is a clear priority, it will only keep around attributes from the first object. The one firm rule is that xray does not do any checking of attributes for conflicts. Unless In cases where there are two objects to combine but where the priority is clearer (e.g., in |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
28376794 |